tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post3494285937094094512..comments2023-04-27T06:14:51.777-07:00Comments on clickthing: Now in 3-Dmpclemenshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12807147515549175803noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-55901172294641943562014-05-24T10:09:04.629-07:002014-05-24T10:09:04.629-07:00Oh dang, you were doing this back in 2009! Apparen...Oh dang, you were doing this back in 2009! Apparently all the nifty photo techniques I've been "discovering" have all been pioneered already by you 5 years ago :DTedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16774432656602082311noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-45666296387525679582009-07-23T11:31:07.217-07:002009-07-23T11:31:07.217-07:00I can't wait! I'm living vicariously throu...I can't wait! I'm living vicariously through your home-developing simply because I'm still too scared to try it m'self.Mike Speeglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08648532407369443335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-85125696294565739472009-07-23T10:34:14.855-07:002009-07-23T10:34:14.855-07:00I actually did two rolls the other night while hal...I actually did two rolls the other night while half-watching some trashy Jackson family biopic... and then screwed up the loading of the film onto the spools, so the wet film stuck to itself. I managed to salvage a few negatives from the one roll, but easily 80% was hosed. I'm still licking my wounds over that one.<br /><br />The other roll came out OK, despite a big tear in the film (camera problem.) I'm working on a second roll of Instamatic-loaded film right now so I can maximize my development output. Watch for more crappy hand-held "scans" of negatives soon!mpclemenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12807147515549175803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-21709331515473417792009-07-23T10:21:58.291-07:002009-07-23T10:21:58.291-07:00I demand more caffenol pictures.I demand more caffenol pictures.Mike Speeglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08648532407369443335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-56143260091752044832009-07-22T13:58:25.102-07:002009-07-22T13:58:25.102-07:00Er, I mean 9 lenticular photos, or 18 normal (flat...Er, I mean 9 lenticular photos, or 18 normal (flat) stereo pairs.<br /><br />"Math is hard!" -- Barbiempclemenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12807147515549175803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-69878324333224110332009-07-22T13:54:15.754-07:002009-07-22T13:54:15.754-07:00In fact, it exposes two frames at the same time, e...In fact, it exposes two frames at the same time, each with a vertically-oriented half frame photo. So the roll of 36 I shot this morning theoretically would give me 9 stereo photos, or 18 stereo pairs. (In truth it was a bit less.) Each lens has its own plastic baffle(?) inside, so the images don't overlap. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/nishika/discuss/72157606449787720/" rel="nofollow">Here's what happens</a> when you tinker with the guts of the camera.<br /><br /><br />Have I mentioned that this camera is BIG? Watch the video -- esp. part 2 -- and look at the size of the thing in the actor's hands. One of my half-frame cameras would be far more convenient.<br /><br />Actually, I bought it so I could make some stero pairs for my old viewer. And the wife was around when this package arrived, so no fear there. I'm just playing catch-up now with stuff I already had sitting around (well, except for Babs.)mpclemenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12807147515549175803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1058472817603514138.post-7416024535259600202009-07-22T13:42:52.188-07:002009-07-22T13:42:52.188-07:00I don't remember if it was the came brand (pro...I don't remember if it was the came brand (probably), but I remember seeing those for sale at the 7-11 back in the day. I seem to recall that you had to send the film back to them to get your lenticular prints.<br /><br />You could probably create a little mask (or masks) to cover up all but one lens at a time. In theory, you could take four different pictures per frame. (This assumes that the camera will allow you to take more than one picture without advancing the film.)<br /><br />Your wife is never going to leave you home alone again, you know that?<br /><br />Word verification: ingeni: a very smart genii.Olivanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13153890530685124767noreply@blogger.com